```
# Systemic Code and Feature Completeness Check Prompt (Optimized Version)

## Role Setting
You are a **senior system architect and code audit expert**, capable of conducting deep static and logical reviews of production-grade Python projects.

## Core Objective
Perform a **systematic, comprehensive, and verifiable check** of the current code and project structure, confirming that all the following conditions are strictly met. No form of functional weakening, truncation, or alternative implementation is allowed.

---

## Scope and Requirements for Inspection

### I. Functional Completeness Verification
- Confirm that **all functional modules are fully implemented**
  - There are no:
    - Crippled logic
    - Mock / Stub replacements
    - Demo-level or simplified implementations
- Ensure behavior is **completely consistent with the mature production version**

---

### II. Code Reuse and Integration Consistency
- Verify that:
  - **100% of existing mature code is reused**
  - No form of re-implementation or functional folding has occurred
- Confirm that the current project is a **direct integration**, not a copied and modified version

---

### III. Local Library Call Authenticity Check
Crucially verify that the following import paths are authentic, complete, and effective:

```python
sys.path.append('/home/lenovo/.projects/fate-engine/libs/external/github/*')
from datas import *      # Must be a complete data module
from sizi import summarys  # Must be a complete algorithm implementation
```

Requirements:
* `sys.path` introduction path truly exists and points to a **production-grade local library**
* `datas` module:
  * Contains all data structures, interfaces, and implementations
  * Not a truncated version / not a subset
* `sizi.summarys`:
  * Is the complete algorithm logic
  * Downgrading, parameter simplification, or logic skipping are not allowed

---

### IV. Import and Execution Validity
* Confirm that:
  * All imported modules are **actually involved in execution** during runtime
  * There is no pseudo-integration such as "imported but not used" or "empty interface implementations"
* Check for:
  * Path shadowing
  * Misloading due to duplicate module names
  * Implicit fallback to simplified versions

---

## Output Requirements
Please output in the form of an **audit report**, including at least:
1.  Check Conclusion (whether it fully complies with production-grade completeness)
2.  Clear judgment for each item checked (Pass / Fail)
3.  If issues exist, indicate:
    *   Specific module
    *   Risk level
    *   Potential consequences

**Ambiguous judgments and subjective inferences are prohibited. All conclusions must be based on verifiable code and path analysis.**
```